Is headcovering for today, as mentioned in 1 Cor 11?
Lets read the text first:
1 Corinthians 11
1 Follow my example, as I follow the example of Christ.
Propriety in Worship
2 I praise you for remembering me in everything and for holding to the teachings, just as I passed them on to you.
3 Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God. 4 Every man who prays or prophesies with his head covered dishonors his head. 5 And every woman who prays or prophesies with her head uncovered dishonors her head—it is just as though her head were shaved. 6 If a woman does not cover her head, she should have her hair cut off; and if it is a disgrace for a woman to have her hair cut or shaved off, she should cover her head. 7 A man ought not to cover his head, since he is the image and glory of God; but the woman is the glory of man. 8 For man did not come from woman, but woman from man; 9 neither was man created for woman, but woman for man. 10 For this reason, and because of the angels, the woman ought to have a sign of authority on her head.
11 In the Lord, however, woman is not independent of man, nor is man independent of woman. 12 For as woman came from man, so also man is born of woman. But everything comes from God. 13 Judge for yourselves: Is it proper for a woman to pray to God with her head uncovered? 14 Does not the very nature of things teach you that if a man has long hair, it is a disgrace to him, 15 but that if a woman has long hair, it is her glory? For long hair is given to her as a covering. 16 If anyone wants to be contentious about this, we have no other practice—nor do the churches of God. NIV
I have come to believe that when praying, it is a good thing for a woman to wear a scarf, veil or bonnet on her head. If you are trying to follow 1 Thessalonians 5:17 and “Pray without ceasing.” then it would make sense to wear the veil all the time. Or at least during the day.
We began to look at this scripture with an open mind. We said if there is something to it we will obey it, if there is not something to it why is it there? We asked why did the church want to forget this set of verses? And why when even just talking about it or asking questions about biblical headcovering, why did so many people lose their cool and get so mad? Is this anger a sign of a well thought out, prayed up Christian that has rightly divided the word of truth? Or is it the flesh of a person who seeks desperately to hold to this idea that headcovering isn’t for today, so they can look the same as everyone else. They don’t want to be required to be different by drawing attention to themselves. They are seeking the honor of men, more than the Honor that comes from God. Trying to be dignified.
The answers we got from people were ones of frustration, anger, or admittance of not knowing and still neglecting biblical headcovering for other reasons. After all the “church” surely can’t be wrong? People answered us saying; “headcovering is legalistic”, “it was only for the Corinthian people”, or “not for the church today”. I think one of the silliest answers we got was that “the woman’s hair itself is the covering”.

First, lets respond to the first answer we received. Headcovering is legalistic, they said. To imply something is legalistic, it implies it is under the Law. Deuteronomy records for us the law given by God. But we find our key text coming from the New Testament, not Deuteronomy. If all the things that are a challange to our flesh are being legalistic then we would be getting rid of verses like “pray for those that dispitefully use you”, and many others. We do not have a bible printed in #2 pencil lead, and can not erase the parts we don’t like by calling them legalistic.
Secondly, how can Biblical headcovering be only for the Corinthian people, and not for the church today? In verse 3 it is clear that this set of verses are about headship, so do we dismiss biblical headship with the covering? Also how could verse 4 refer to “Every man” or in verse 5 refers to every woman? Is the Bible wrong? Lets go on… Verse 6-7 and other verses would read more like 6 If a (CORINTHIAN) woman does not cover her head, she should have her hair cut off; and if it is a disgrace for a woman to have her hair cut or shaved off, she should cover her head. 7 A (CORINTHIAN) man ought not to cover his head, since he is the image and glory of God; but the woman is the glory of man. At the end of verse 7 it reads “since he is the image and glory of God; but the woman is the glory of man.” It becomes clear that this is a statement about men and women in general, not just to the Corinthians. Also if we come to the place we say this is just for the people of Corinthians how do we keep the Lord’s Supper found starting in verse 17? Was it just for the Corinthians too? Why do it either then? Of course not, they are both valid!
Third, a few people said “the woman’s hair itself is the covering.” I believe this is one of the easiest myths to dispel about headcovering. It can be found in error by just reading through the whole text. The Bible does say in verse 15 “But if a woman have long hair, it is a glory to her: for her hair is given her for A COVERING.” Not necessarily “THE” covering talked about here also. When you have a sheet and blanket on a bed, it has two coverings, serving their own purposes. The last half of verse 7 says; “but the woman is the glory of man.” The wife is the husband’s glory, and the hair is given to her as a covering for her glory. The woman’s hair itself is not “the” covering because in verse 1 COR 11:6 “If a woman does not cover her head, she should have her hair cut off; and if it is a disgrace for a woman to have her hair cut or shaved off, she should cover her head.” It is clear these are two different coverings.
In verse 16, it says; “If anyone wants to be contentious about this, we have no other practice—nor do the churches of God.” He says we have no other practice about covering or not covering. This was the practice they held and so did the churches of God. It was seen as a common practice.
The Bible says the lack of a headcovering brings dishonor to her head when praying. Her “head” is her husband. Many Husbands in today’s world do not even realize, they are being dishonored. It is like a civilization in the jungle some where that has shed their honor and left their clothes behind to run naked. After a few generations there is a searing of the conscience that says there is nothing wrong with our nakedness. But when they come to know the Lord, and when missionaries teach them the Word concerning modesty, “if they listen” the conviction of the Holy Spirit is there. The next thing you know you see tribal people wearing hawaiian shirts or anything else they can put on.
The same is true about the biblical headcovering. When the truth is spoken, and “IF THE PEOPLE LISTEN” the conviction of the Spirit is there to help people yield their hearts to the Lord. But if they are already bitter, or prejudged the scripture as not relative to today, or do not have an open mind to the Word then they will not receive from that part of the Word. Sadly this is often the case.
As shadows of things to come, the old covenant is filled with things that were a symbol of what was to be fufilled in the new covenant. The lambs blood on the doorpost during passover allowed the spirit of death to “pass over”, in the New Testament we cover the doorpost of hearts with the blood of “The Lamb” Jesus Christ so we can pass from death to life. The headcovering wore by women of old was a mere symbol of their natural place of submission to their authority in this life. But the biblical headcovering taught in 1 Cor 11 is more than a mere symbol of natural position.
When man fell in the garden of Eden they lost their Glory that radiated from them. Prior to this they needed no clothing. But when sin came the Glory departed. They had to make themselves clothes of leaves. Then God shed the blood of animals to make them a covering for their bodies. As born again believers we have the Holy Spirit residing in us, and the glory bursting at the seams waiting to get out. I believe as we receive our Glorified bodies we will shine like we were meant to.
2 Corinthians 5:17
“Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation; the old has gone, the new has come!”
The Spirit within is new. When we come to God we do so like never before in the history of man. Adam and Eve were “spiritually innocent” before the fall, but we are “spiritually justified” by the blood of Jesus. We are equal in God’s sight by the Blood. Yet there is a headship order He established. As the man and woman come before God, they would be equals by the work of the Blood, the woman voluntarily places the headcovering over her glory as a symbol, to show she recognizes the authority given to her by God (her husband). So she honors her head by showing it as an outward sign of submission, that even the Angels can see.
This is clearly a new covenant reality and teaching, that has more to do with the rebirth of mankind as believers than most of us had previously thought. The glory of the recreated spirit of man, is why in the new covenant, a man can pray uncoverd before God, and in the old covenant they would not. Even practicing Jews still cover their heads.
So yes, biblical headcovering is for us to observe today as never before. It is bursting forth with new covenant realities and revelation.